Back

langchain #34629

test(langchain): types in `test_tool_call_limit` and `test_model_retry`

by cbornet · Feb 06, 2026 at 19:28 UTC · scan-a39d7007f09b2277

View on Github · Download JSON
Low Risk (20%)

Get this automatically on every PR

Install the Axiomo GitHub App to get Signals as check runs and PR comments on every pull request.

Install App

Risk Assessment

Risk level: Low (20%)

Risk Drivers

  • api_surface_change: API surface changed in 2 file(s)

Intent

2/2 criteria met

Add type annotations to test_tool_call_limit and test_model_retry

Acceptance Criteria

  • ✓
    Type annotations added to test_tool_call_limit

    Added Callable import in test_model_retry and adjusted imports in test_tool_call_limit.

  • ✓
    Type annotations added to test_model_retry

    Callable import in test_model_retry and minor adjustments indicate types added.

Confidence: 95.0% Source: diff analysis AI: openai

Contributors

cbornet PR Author 1 commit + Trusted
Account Age: 3972 days
Prior PRs: 442
Merged: 398

Trusted contributor with 398 merged PRs. maintains 129 public repositories. has 177 followers.

mdrxy 3 commits + Trusted
Account Age: 2175 days
Prior PRs: 688
Merged: 633

Trusted contributor with 633 merged PRs. has 250 followers.

Evidence

Evidence Completeness: 80.0%
ci_passing Passing
tests_passing Passing
lint_passing Passing
build_successful Passing
Missing: security_scan_clean, coverage_maintained

Supply Chain

None Risk
Modifies dependencies
Modifies lockfile
Modifies CI config
Modifies build scripts

Focus Files

Review 1 high-priority file(s)

libs/langchain_v1/tests/unit_tests/agents/middleware/implementations/test_tool_call_limit.py +242

242 lines changed; Source code

high
libs/langchain_v1/tests/unit_tests/agents/middleware/implementations/test_model_retry.py +13

Source code

medium

Triage

34

minutes to review

medium

effort level

none

staleness risk

Standard review process

Recommendation

APPROVE 81.0% readiness

Good evidence, acceptable risk, ready for merge

Next Steps

Question

Why is security_scan_clean missing? Consider adding this check.

Question

Why is coverage_maintained missing? Consider adding this check.